We are looking to sustain the development of infed through contributions from a range of different writers. Our aim is to provide a space for people to explore education, pedagogy, learning and change.
The site is run on a not-for-profit basis. We are part of the British Library archiving project and a number of the pages are included on the UNESCO/NCVER voced database and on SOSIG (the Social Science Information Gateway).
If you have something that you want to write or submit, or wish to select something to work on from our wish list, we’d like to hear from you. Its best to contact us before you get a long way into it – there may be someone else also working on a similar subject area. As you will have probably gathered we run the page on a shoestring – so any work has to be done for love.
Below we have set out some guidelines for contributors. We operate a refereeing system – so you will get feedback on your contribution.
Audience. At the moment our pages are accessed around four million times a year. About 20 per cent of browsers come from Britain and Ireland, 35 per cent from North America, 10 per cent from India, 6 per cent from the Phillipines, and around 6 per cent from Australia and New Zealand. The other 23 per cent are spread across the rest of the world.
The main users fall into three camps:
- students in both higher and further education. They are often involved in programmes in youth work, community work, social work, schooling, adult education and community education.
- academics with a professionals interest in the area.
- practitioners working in work with children and young people (including schooling, social pedagogy and social work), human relations, museum education, lifelong learning and community development. They are often engaged in the development of new nitiatives e.g. in higher education, community education, libraries and museums – especially in north America, Australia and Europe.
Writing style. We like writing that is direct and accessible. You need to write short sentences and to avoid the overuse of long words and technical terms. A good working rule here might be to imagine your readers as interested colleagues, who perhaps don’t have access to the same specialist language as yourselves. Thus, you will need to explain some terms, but must avoid talking down to readers.
- themes – such as developments in community schooling or in project work.
- thinkers. We have a lot of gaps and are constantly open to suggestions for inclusion.
- issues and talking points
The pieces on key thinkers tend to have the same format:
- a biographical sketch
- key ideas and themes
- assessment of their contribution
- conclusion with some discussion of continuing relevance etc.
Referencing. The referencing system we use involves putting the writer’s name, date, and if required, page numbers in brackets in the text i.e. (Jones 1979: 63). Then the full reference is put at the end. Bascially APA!
Where the quote is substantial, say over five lines, it should be indented. In this case the full stop comes at the end of the text, and the reference after that (Jones 1979: 63) This reference system is usually known as the Harvard system.
References should be listed alphabetically by writer and then chronologically for more than one work by the same writer.
Books: Assensoh, A. B. (1998). African Political Leadership: Jomo Kenyatta, Kwame Nkrumah, and Julius K. Nyerere. New York: Krieger Publishing Co.
Chapters: Samoff, J. (1990). “Modernizing” a socialist vision: education in Tanzania in M. Carnoy and J. Samoff (eds.) Education and Social Transition in the Third World. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Articles: Humphries, B. (1988). Adult learning in social work education: towards liberation or domestication, Critical Social Policy No. 23 pp. 4-21.
Reports: Department for Education and Employment (1999). Learning to Succeed. A new framework for post 16 learning. London: The Stationery Office (Cm 4392). (If the report is known by its chair please put in brackets after the title).
Internet materials: Boje, D. M. and Rosile, G. A. (2001). Where’s the Power in Empowerment? Answers from Follett and Clegg, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 37(1): 90-117. [http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje//CleggFollett4_index.html. Retrieved: January 23, 2003].
Racist and sexist language etc. Please avoid gender specific language, except where applicable to a particular individual, and anything that might be construed as sexist. We try to avoid the use of s/he and her/his which can be somewhat repetitive and ugly. The best way around this, we feel, is to use the plural – they, people, educators etc. Likewise, please avoid all language and connotations that might be construed as racist. Also consider the extent to which your contribution might be considered as being ethnocentric.
We place your name as the copyright holder but give permission for the piece to be reproduced for educational and training purposes (copyright @ the informal education homepage).
We are also happy if you want to use the material elsewhere.
- plain text (ASCII)
- Rich Text Format (RTF)
If not just send material to us on single sided paper, with a fairly large print face and double-spaced if possible.
Acknowledgement: Picture: Writing in the park by Roey Ahram. Sourced from Flickr and reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) licence. http://www.flickr.com/photos/roeyahram/6659760491/.